The simple message of Sri Ramana Maharshi, one of India’s most revered spiritual master, whose teaching, forty years after his death, are speaking to growing
audiences worldwide. Be As You Are, edited by the librarian at the sage’s ashram¬¬–still flourishing––at the foot of the holy mountain of Arunachala, is a
compendium of those riches as bequeathed personally to pilgrims hungry to discover what is ‘the ultimate truth’.
‘Nothing more than being in the pristine state. That is all that need be said,’ declared Sri Ramana. Indeed it is claimed that his highest teachings, to those capable
of receiving them, consisted of nothing but silence during which be transmitted a silent flow of power enabling individuals to experience, directly, what he meant
by enlightenment. This book is for those of us who would remain perplexed, but enriched, by the silence.
Ramana Maharshi was one of the most significant spiritual teachers to emerge from India during the first half of this century, and remains widely admired. This
recent collection of conversations between him and the many seekers who came to his ashram for guidance contains the essence of his teaching.
David Godman has spent the last nine years in India studying and practising the teachings of Sri Ramana. He is the librarian of Sri Ramana’s ashram and a former
editor of The Mountain Path, a journal which propagates Sri Ramana’s teachings.
In 1896 a sixteen-year-old schoolboy walked out on his family and, driven by an inner compulsion, slowly made his way to Arunachala, a holy mountain and
pilgrimage centre in South India. On his arrival he threw away all his money and possessions and abandoned himself to a newly-discovered awareness that his
real nature was formless, immanent consciousness. His absorption in this awareness was so intense that he was completely oblivious of his body and the world;
insects chewed away portions of his legs, his body wasted away because he was rarely conscious enough to eat and his hair and fingernails grew to
unmanageable lengths. After two or three years in this state he began a slow return to physical normality, a process that was not finally completed for several
years. His awareness of himself as consciousness was unaffected by this physical transition and it remained continuous and undimmed for the rest of his life. In
Hindu parlance he had ‘realised the Self’; that is to say, he had realised by direct experience that nothing existed apart from an indivisible and universal
consciousness which was experienced in its unmanifest form as beingness or awareness and in its manifest form as the appearance of the universe.
Normally this awareness is only generated after a long and arduous period of spiritual practice but in this case it happened spontaneously, without prior effort or
desire. Venkataraman, the sixteen-year-old schoolboy, was alone in an upstairs room of his uncle’s house in Madurai (near the southern tip of India) when he was
suddenly gripped by an intense fear of death. In the following few minutes he went through a simulated death experience during which he became consciously
aware for the first time that his real nature was imperishable and that it was unrelated to the body, the mind or the personality. Many people have reported similar
unexpected experiences but they are almost invariably temporary. In Venkataraman’s case the experience was permanent and irreversible. From that time on his
consciousness of being an individual person ceased to exist and it never functioned in him again.
Venkataraman told no one about his experience and for six weeks he kept up the appearance of being an ordinary schoolboy. However, he found it an increasingly
difficult posture to maintain and at the end of this six week period he abandoned his family and went directly to the holy mountain of Arunachala.
The choice of Arunachala was far from random. Throughout his brief life he had always associated the name of Arunachala with God and it was a major
revelation to him when he discovered that it was not some heavenly realm but a tangible earthly entity. The mountain itself had long been regarded by Hindus as a
manifestation of Siva, a Hindu God, and in later years Venkataraman often said that it was the spiritual power of Arunachala which had brought about his Self-
realisation. His love for the mountain was so great that from the day he arrived in 1896 until his death in 1950 he could never be persuaded to go more than two
miles away from its base.
After a few years of living on its slopes his inner awareness began to manifest as an outer spiritual radiance. This radiance attracted a small circle of followers
and, although he remained silent for most of the time, he embarked upon a teaching career. One of his earliest followers, impressed by the evident saintliness and
wisdom of the young man, decided to rename him Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi– Bhagavan means Lord of God, Sri is an Indian honorific title, Ramana is a
contraction of Venkataraman and Maharshi means ‘great seer’ in Sanskrit. The name found favour with his other followers and it soon became the title by which
he became known to the world.
At this stage of his life Sri Ramana was speaking very little and so his teachings were transmitted in an unusual fashion. Instead of giving out verbal instructions
he constantly emanated a silent force or power which stilled the minds of those who were attuned to it and occasionally even gave them a direct experience of the
state that he himself was perpetually immersed in. In later years he became more willing to give out verbal teachings, but even then, the silent teachings were
always available to those who were able to make good use of them. Throughout his life Sri Ramana insisted that this silent flow of power represented his
teachings in their most direct and concentrated form. The importance he attached to this is indicated by his frequent statements to the effect that his verbal
teachings were only given out to those who were unable to understand his silence.
As the years passed he became more and more famous. A community grew up around him, thousands of visitors flocked to see him and for the last twenty years
of his life he was widely regarded as India’s most popular and revered holy man. Some of these thousands were attracted by the peace they felt in his presence,
others by the authoritative way in which he guided spiritual seekers and interpreted religious teachings, and some merely came to tell him their problems.
Whatever their reasons for coming almost everyone who came into contact with him was impressed by his simplicity and his humbleness. He made himself
available to visitors twenty-four hours a day by living and sleeping in a communal hall which was always accessible to everyone, and his only private possessions
were a loin-cloth, a water-pot and a walking-stick. Although he was worshipped by thousands as a living God, he refused to allow anyone to treat him as a
special person and he always refused to accept anything which could not be shared equally by everyone in his ashram. He shared in the communal work and for
many years he rose at 3 a.m. in order to prepare food for the residents of the ashram. His sense of equality was legendary. When visitors came to see him-it made
no difference whether they were VIPs, peasants of animals–they would all be treated with equal respect and consideration. His egalitarian concern even extended
to the local trees; he discouraged his followers from picking flowers or leaves off them and he tried to ensure that whenever fruit was taken from the ashram
trees it was always done in such a way that the tree only suffered a minimum amount of pain.
Throughout this period (1925-50) the centre of ashram life was the small hall where Sri Ramana lived, slept and held court. He spent most of his day sitting in
one corner radiating his silent power and simultaneously fielding questions from the constant flow of visitors who descended on him from every corner of the
globe. He rarely committed his ideas to paper and so the verbal replies given out during this period (by far the most well-documented of his life) represent the
largest surviving source of his teachings.
These verbal teachings flowed authoritatively from his direct knowledge that consciousness was the only existing reality. Consequently, all his explanations and
instructions were geared to convincing his followers that this was their true and natural state. Few of his followers were capable of assimilating this truth in its
highest and most undiluted form and so he often adapted his teachings to conform to the limited understanding of the people who came to him for advice.
Because of this tendency it is possible to distinguish many different levels of his teachings. At the highest level that could be expressed in words he would say
that consciousness alone exists. If this was received with scepticism he would say that awareness of this truth is obscured by the self-limiting ideas of the mind
and that if these ideas were abandoned then the reality of consciousness would be revealed. Most of his followers found this high-level approach a little too
theoretical-they were so immersed in the self-limiting ideas that Sri Ramana was encouraging them to drop that they felt that the truth about consciousness
would only be revealed to them if they underwent a long period of spiritual practice. To satisfy such people Sri Ramana prescribed an innovative method of self-
attention which he called self-enquiry. He recommended this technique so often and so vigorously that it was regarded by many people as the most distinctive
motif in his teachings.
Even then, many people were not satisfied and they would continue to ask for advice about other methods or try to engage him in theoretical philosophical
discussions. With such people Sri Ramana would temporarily abandon his absolute standpoint and give appropriate advice on whatever level it was asked. If he
appeared on these occasions to accept and endorse many of the misconceptions which his visitors had about themselves it was only to draw their attention to
some aspect of his teachings that he felt would help them to better understand his real views.
Inevitably, this policy of modifying his teaching to meet the needs of different people led to many contradictions. He might, for example, tell one person that the
individual self is non-existent and then turn to another person and give a detailed description of how the individual self functions, accumulates karma and
reincarnates. It is possible for an observer to say that such opposing statements may both be true when seen from different standpoints, but the former statement
clearly has more validity when it is viewed from the absolute standpoint of Sri Ramana’s own experience. This standpoint, summarised by his statement that
consciousness alone exists, is ultimately the only yardstick by which one can realistically assess the relative truth of his widely differing and contradictory
statements. To whatever extent his other statements deviate from this it may be assumed that to that extent they are dilutions of the truth.
Bearing this in mind I have tried to arrange the material in this book in such a way that his highest teachings come first and his least important or most diluted
ones last. The only exception is a chapter in which he talks about his silent teachings. It ought to be somewhere near the beginning but I found it more expedient
for a variety of reasons to fit it into a section about half-way through the book.
I decided on this overall structure for two reasons. Firstly it gives the reader a chance to gauge the relative importance of the various ideas presented, and
secondly, and more importantly, it was Sri Ramana’s own preferred method of teaching. When visitors came to see him he would always try to convince them of
the truth of his higher teachings and only if they seemed unwilling to accept them would he tone down his answers and speak from a more relative level.
The teachings have been presented in the form of a series of questions and answers in which Sri Ramana outlines his views on various subjects. Each chapter is
devoted to a different topic and each topic is prefaced by a few introductory or explanatory remarks. The questions and answers which form the bulk of each
chapter have been taken from many sources and assembled in such a way that they give the appearance of being a continuous conversation. I was forced to adopt
this method because there are no continuous lengthy conversations available which cover the full spectrum of his views on any particular subject. For those who
are interested, the sources of the quotations which make up the conversations are all listed at the end of the book.
Sri Ramana usually answered questions in one of the three vernacular languages of South India: Tamil, Telugu and Malayalam. No tape-recordings were ever
made and most of his answers were hurriedly written down in English by his official interpreters. Because some of the interpreters were not completely fluent in
English some of the transcriptions were either ungrammatical or written in a kind of stilted English which occasionally makes Sri Ramana sound like a pompous
Victorian. I have deviated from the published texts by correcting a few of the worst examples of this kind; in such cases the meaning has not been tampered with,
only the mode of expression. I have also contracted some of the questions and answers in order to eliminate material which digressed too far from the subject
under discussion. Throughout the book the questions are prefaced by a ‘Q:’ and Sri Ramana’s answers by an ‘A:’.
The original texts from which these conversations are taken are characterised by a luxuriant profusion of capital letters. I have eliminated most of them, leaving
only three terms, Guru, Self and Heart, consistently capitalised. Sri Ramana often used these terms as synonyms for consciousness and wherever this meaning is
implied I have retained the capitalisation to avoid confusion.
A complete glossary of Sanskrit words which are not translated in the text can be found at the end of the book. The same glossary also includes brief descriptions
of unfamiliar people, places and scriptural works which are mentioned in the text. Sri Ramana occasionally used Sanskrit terms in unconventional ways. On the
few occasions that he does so in this book I have ignored the standard dictionary definitions and have instead given a definition which more accurately reflects
the intended meaning.
Send as free online greeting card
Email a Friend